How Should I Study For The LSAT?

The LSAC has released figures based on research about the correlation between study methods and LSAT scores.

Some of the study methods they analyzed included:

  • Studying sample questions in the LSAT Info Book
  • Taking the free sample LSAT in the LSAT Info Book
  • Working through LSAT Prep Tests
  • Using LSAT prep books or software not published by the LSAC
  • Attending a commercial test prep course or coaching course
  • Attending a prep course or coaching course provided by their university
  • Self Study

Here are the results for 2005-2008:

  LSAT Mean 2005-2006 LSAT Mean 2006-2007 LSAT Mean 2007-2008
Method of Study Users Non-Users Diff. Users Non-

Users

Diff. Users Non-Users Diff.
Sample Question in LSAT Registration Book 149.31 151.19 -1.88 149.53 151.29 -1.76 149.87 151.02 -1.15
Free Sample LSAT in LSAT Info Book 151.01 150.82 +.19 151.20 150.95 +0.25 151.37 150.64 +.73
Working through Official LSAT Prep Tests 152.79 150.04 +2.75 152.71 150.31 +2.40 152.17 150.12 +2.05
LSAT book not published by LSAC 151.85 150.06 +1.79 152.00 150.21 +1.79 152.00 149.80 +2.20
Commercial Test Prep or Coaching Course 152.12 150.06 +2.06 152.26 150.19 +2.07 152.32 149.87 +2.45
Attending a test prep or coaching course offered through a university 147.85 151.05 -3.20 147.69 151.23 -3.54 147.87 150.97 -3.10
Self-Study 151.17 150.55 +0.62 151.35 150.63 +0.72 151.04 150.53 -1.33

As you can see the methods of test prep seemed to have the biggest difference on test scores were:

  1. Working Through the Official Prep Tests= +2.4
  2. Studying with an LSAT Book not published by the LSAC= +1.93
  3. Commercial Test Prep or Coaching Course= +2.19

Now, to be clear, this is correlation and not causation, so this is not to say that these methods of preparation caused increased test scores. But it is an interesting causation.

Source: Summary of Self-Reported Methods of Test Preparation by LSAT Test Takers for Testing Years 2005-2008. Josiah Evans, Andrea Thornton, Lynda Reese.